Can we handle the harsh climate truth?

When I was in Manhattan for New York Climate Week in late September I met climate author and activist Margaret Klein Salamon for the first time. Margaret played a key role some years ago in getting activists, and then much of the press and many political leaders to use the term “climate emergency.”  In 2016 she wrote an influential paper titled “Leading the Public into Emergency Mode: A New Strategy for the Climate Movement.” That paper had a big impact on my own thinking and I’ve long admired her work, so I felt especially honored to get to meet her and talk with her.

She gave me a copy of her new book “Facing the Climate Emergency: How to Transform Yourself with Climate Truth.”  Reading it has been quite an experience for me.  On the one hand, I find it deeply reassuring that someone else understands how serious the climate situation is and knows that we are going to have to feel a lot of feelings in order to engage fully with it. At the same time, I’m asking myself, “Am I living my life as though we are in an emergency? Or am I still trying to have a business-as-usual lifestyle that’s inappropriate to our times?”

Can people handle fear?
In her book Margaret is quite critical of what she calls the “gradualist” climate movement–which includes many of the mainstream climate organizations and many climate journalists. She sees them as sharing an orthodoxy that says “we must not scare the public; they can’t handle it.”  This generally includes the view that people need hope, not fear.

She writes:
“The fact that most climate communicators prioritize not scaring people should scare you.  It means that these communicators avoid telling the whole truth. They are not talking about the risk of the collapse of civilization or the deaths of billions of people, even though we are clearly careening toward these catastrophes.”

Emergency mode
She sees this as not giving the public the information they need in order to respond appropriately to the climate emergency–to go into “emergency mode” and mount the kind of all-out, all-hands-on-deck response that is needed.

This naturally led me to take a hard look in the mirror and ask myself if I have been failing, as I write these bi-weekly blog posts, to tell my readers the whole truth. I certainly have wanted to help readers sustain hope and have often been appreciated for doing that. I have not believed that you couldn’t handle the whole truth, but I’ll leave it to you to judge whether I have been too reluctant to focus on how dire the situation is.

I still believe that the “climate doomers” are wrong to think that the situation is so bad we should give up; but they are not wrong that more climate disaster is coming. Humanity worldwide, but especially in the wealthy nations, must change course and dramatically accelerate our elimination of fossil fuels, while increasing our use of renewable energy, our preservation of forests, and adoption of sustainable practices throughout our economy and our lifestyles.

How bad is it?
It’s hard to overstate how bad the climate crisis is already.  In 2022 floods in Pakistan displaced 33 million people. Over 60,000 people died from heat related causes in the European heat wave that same year. Canadian wildfires in 2023 burned an area larger that 104 of the world’s 190 countries and released more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than the emissions of 100 of the world’s countries. These facts are excruciating to face … and they are part of our new reality.

Extreme heat, wildfires, droughts, floods, hunger, sea level rise, and global temperatures are all still increasing. By 2050 there may be over 200 million climate refugees globally. That many people on the move will threaten to destabilize countless nations and may lead to endless deadly conflicts.

There are alternatives to being overwhelmed
We could choose to be overwhelmed by this. We could choose to give up. But there will always be lives to be saved and suffering to be averted by slowing the rise in global temperatures. It will never be too late to make a difference.  Instead of giving up, we could come to our senses, rise up, and join with other people at home and around the world to preserve the Earth as a livable home for humans and other species.

Courage and love
If we find hope difficult, we can base our actions on courage and love. These are, perhaps, more durable than hope, and will continue to be relevant no matter how bad things get.

Become less of an individual
If your question is, “What can I do about climate change as an individual?”  The answer is, “Become less of an individual. Join with others.” Join the climate movement. Join an organization–local, national, or global. There are campaigns already underway that need your involvement. We know enough to solve the climate crisis now. What we need is an all-inclusive, widespread peoples’ movement where we address the climate emergency together.

__________

You may also be interested in a post I wrote in May of last year about Margaret Klein Salamon, climate anxiety, what kind of organizations make the most difference, and the “Climate Emergency Fund” .

The photo above is a sunset over the Elk River, Maryland, by Amy Vernon-Jones.

I’ll let you know when my next new post is available.
Click “Subscribe” below.

SUBSCRIBE

4 thoughts on “Can we handle the harsh climate truth?

  • November 28, 2023 at 5:44 pm
    Permalink

    “Become less of an individual” says it all Russ. I’ve just spent 4 days at a blockade of the world’s largest coal port in Newcastle, Australia. I carried around my personal anxiety about whether my contribution was enough. I also made SO many connections that cut through that isolation. Over 1,000 people came together from around the country, bringing their own skills, labour and creativity. Together we closed the port for 33 hours, finishing with a kayak fleet of 109 people who were arrested.

    Reply
    • November 29, 2023 at 10:15 am
      Permalink

      Three cheers and a big debt of gratitude to Sandy, Nicky, and all of the Australian climate activists who joined in protesting and shutting down the largest coal port in the world for 33 hours! What an outstanding model! Thank you!

      Reply
  • December 19, 2023 at 7:44 pm
    Permalink

    Hurray Russ, you have stopped pulling your punches. I’m finding that many are still giving little thought to the climate crisis much less changing their lifestyles. In my world, very few people are cutting meat out of their diets. Raising beef cattle continues as the demand is there. That pasture land could be turned into forests to sequester carbon. Many people still heat and cook with gas. For heat we are no longer using gas but individual VORNADO heaters only in the room(s) we are in. I wish I could afford an electric hot water heater. We drive as little as possible, a 12 year old Toyota Prius wagon hybrid one of the better cars ever made. I’m a year into Long COVID next week and a caretaker for my husband so can’t fight in other ways. I hope you will try some of these. Daphne Stevens, a 44 year climate activist.

    Reply
    • December 26, 2023 at 3:40 pm
      Permalink

      Daphne,
      Thanks for all you are doing! I’m sorry that your struggle with Long COVID is continuing. I wish you new health and strength in the new year! I’m now eating a largely plant based diet, but not 100%. We’ve installed air source heat pump mini-splits for our heating and driving an old plug-in Prius.
      While you focus on regaining your health, I hope many of us can follow your model of lowering our individual carbon footprints and also do a bit extra to help contribute to the climate movement’s campaigns for systemic change.
      Best wishes,
      Russ

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *